Hair loss in women · sourced, dated, unsold
The part is where it shows first
- hormones
- iron, thyroid
- a medicine
- inherited pattern
- where it shows first
A widening part, a thinner ponytail, more hair in the brush. This site takes women's hair loss apart cause by cause — pattern loss, after a birth, through menopause, with PCOS, on a GLP-1 medicine — and grades every treatment on what was actually tested in women.
Start with the question you came with
All of it →Minoxidil in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: What the Labels Say
The women's minoxidil label, the tablet label and the NIH lactation database disagree in tone. Here is each one, word for word.
Receding Hairline in Women: Pattern Loss, Traction or FFA?
A woman's hairline that moves back is often traction or FFA, not pattern loss. The scarring signs come first.
GLP-1 Medicines and Hair Shedding: What the Trials Pooled
Nine interventional studies and 4,114 people on GLP-1 medicines produced a pooled hair-loss risk ratio of 3.252 — with a confidence interval wide enough to be honest about, and a likely mechanism that has nothing to do with the drug's chemistry.
Hers for Hair Loss, Read From the Company's Own Filings
Hers would not let us read its shop — so we read its parent company's annual report instead, which turns out to be far more informative about who prescribes, who dispenses, and how the billing works.
Nutrafol Women Review: The Trials, and Who Wrote Them
Three women's formulas, one price, and two genuine randomised placebo-controlled trials — both co-authored by a co-founder of the company. Scored 6 out of 10 on a published scale, with the arithmetic shown.
Hair Transplants for Women: Who Is Actually a Candidate
Women were 15.3% of surgical hair-restoration patients in 2024. The reason is not prejudice — it is the donor area, and it is the first thing a careful surgeon will talk you out of surgery over.
What this site is for
It exists because the search results for women's hair loss are mostly shops. Ask what to do about a widening part and you are handed a subscription before anyone has asked whether your thyroid has been checked, whether you had a baby four months ago, or whether the medicine you started in spring is doing it.
So this site does the boring parts in the right order. Every fragile fact carries a source and the date it was read. Every treatment is graded on whether it was tested in women, not on how confidently it is sold to them. Where the honest answer is a pharmacy generic or a blood test, that is said first, and it is said plainly that those pay us nothing.
What you will not find here
No photographs of anyone's scalp, and no before-and-after galleries — they are the least reliable and most manipulative thing in this field, and the demand for them is not a good enough reason. No invented statistics. No "nine in ten women". No patient quotes we made up, no "we tested it", no clinics or surgeons ranked, and no dosing instructions of any kind: strengths are described as the label prints them, and what to take is between you and a prescriber.
There is also no medical reviewer here, and you will never see a claim that there is. This site is written from labels, regulators, trial papers and company filings, and read by no clinician before publication. That is exactly why every page points you to one.
Where to start
If you want the short version: get a diagnosis, then read the graded list of every treatment offered to women. If you want to understand what is happening before you decide anything, start with why a part widens. If the loss followed a birth, the timing of postpartum shedding will probably reassure you more than any product will.